It is also inconsistent with previous versions of the ATO website on crypto currency taxation.
The ATO section of crypto currency had a section on mining, which stated two different ways of treating it.
mining as a hoby ( costs cannot be deducted ), where rewards are new assets with a zero cost base.
mining as a buesiness ( costs and depretiation can be deducted ), rewards new asset with market value as cost base + considered income for the buesiness
This section has been removed, but a link to the forum post with an answer is refferenced in the above guide.
My question is:
why is POS and POW treated differently, when they same thing essentially.
Does the Hobby vs Buesiness treatement apply to Proof of Stake (POS).
In terms of compliance, treating all new rewards as a new CGT asset with a cost base of zero is a lot simpler for people just running a POS node on their PC eg doing it as a hobby.
Otherwise, people would need to keep detailed records every time they are rewarded, might happen frequently and keep records of the market price at that time. They would also need to track electricity and internet useage plus include running the POS software eg if its running on the cloud.
I feel that if POW has this treatment the same should apply to POS, outlined