Loading
This thread is archived and the information may not be up-to-date. You can't reply to this thread.
_MarkyMark(Initiate)Initiate
18 Feb 2021

Hi all - I have a question for a client of mine.

Facts - which I agree to:

  • for the 2019/2020 income year, they were:
    • a Working Holiday Maker from 1 July 2019 to 1 December 2019;
    • an 820 visa holder from 1 December 2019 to 30 June 2020;
    • a resident for tax purposes from 1 December 2019.
    • Calculated tax free threshold to be $13,464
    • Working Holiday income $29k
    • Non-working holiday income $47k
    • Working Holiday maker from Canada. on a 417 Visa
  • Working holiday income will be taxed first

Issue:

My client has been denied the tax free threshold because "WHM income is greater than the tax-free threshold of $16,xxx". I have looked over the below legislations and could not find any section excluding tax residents from the tax free thresold notwithstanding their WHM status.

  • Income Tax Rates Amendment (Working Holiday Maker Reform) Act 2016
  • Income Tax Rates Act 1986

Now also considering the results from Commissioner of Taxation v Addy - does anyone know if this treatment by the ATO is correct? and whether or not it is worth looking into further?

1,304 views
2 replies
1,304 views
2 replies

Most helpful response

All replies

Loading
Working Holiday maker and resident for tax purposes - no tax free threshold | ATO Community