Loading
alauddin(Enthusiast)Enthusiast
21 Apr 2026

In an SMSF, a property has been purchased that consists of one shop and three residential units. I was wondering if we need to categorise it as either residential or commercial, as the entire property is considered one whole unit according to the contract of sale. In the accounting software, there is no option to split the property unless two ledgers are used for the commercial and residential components, which would ultimately be counted as two properties when lodging tax returns.


What is the best way to report this? Would it be acceptable to report under the more dominant type—for example, treating it as 70% residential—so that we can classify the whole property as a residential unit, disregarding the 30% commercial aspect?

26 views
2 replies
26 views
2 replies

All replies

KaraATO(Community Support)Community Support
24 Apr 2026

Hi @alauddin,


Because SMSF can be complex, we're going to ask one of our technical experts for assistance.


We'll be back with some updated info as soon as possible.

RachelATO(Community Moderator)Community Moderator
30 Apr 2026

Hi alauddin,


Our experts have got back to us and explained that when an SMSF owns a property under one legal title, the property is recorded as one asset in the financial statements. Because the fund legally owns it as a single property.


The fact that the property has mixed use should be explained in the supporting records. This helps show which parts are residential and which parts are commercial.


Any income, expenses, and deductions should be split between the residential and commercial parts. The method used should be reasonable and well documented. This helps ensure that income and deductions are treated correctly based on how each part of the property is used.


Even though the property is shown as one asset, compliance rules are checked separately. Residential areas are assessed under the rules for residential property. The commercial area is assessed under the rules for business real property and arm’s length transactions. This should be recorded in the auditor’s working papers.


Under super law, trustees do not use a ‘dominant use’ approach to make classification easier.


For more info, you can read through the Guide to valuing SMSF assets. You should chat with an SMSF agent or accountant though. They'll use guidance from their professional body to classify the mixed‑use of the property in financial statements.

Loading
Do mixed-use properties in an SMSF need to be split during recording in the financial statements? | ATO Community