Loading
AverageJoe(I'm new)I'm new
5 May 2026

Hello team,


I’ve been reading through information regarding the 6-year rule for main residence exemptions and I’m a bit confused. I was hoping someone with more knowledge on this could help clarify.

One of the eligibility criteria states that the property must first have been your main residence, and that you cannot apply the main residence exemption to a period before the property became your main residence (for example, if the property was rented out before you moved into it).

In the following scenario, would the 6-year rule still apply after the owner moved out?

For example:

  • Owner A purchases a property in 2010
  • The property is rented out from 2010 to 2011
  • Owner A then moves into the property and lives in it as their PPOR from 2011 to 2016
  • In 2016, Owner A moves out and rents the property out again
  • The property continues to be rented until it is sold in 2026
  • During this time, Owner A rents elsewhere and does not nominate another property as their PPOR

Would the main residence exemption apply from 2011 (when it first became the owner’s main residence) through to 2022 (5 years living in the property + the 6-year absence rule)?

Or does the fact that the property was initially rented before becoming a PPOR affect the owner’s ability to use the 6-year rule for the later rental period?

44 views
3 replies
44 views
3 replies

All replies

Taxduck(Taxicorn)Taxicorn
5 May 2026

Would the main residence exemption apply from 2011 (when it first became the owner’s main residence) through to 2022 (5 years living in the property + the 6-year absence rule)?


Yes. You have satisfied the eligibility requirement that the dwelling "must first have been your main residence".

Treating former home as main residence | Australian Taxation Office

AverageJoe(I'm new)I'm new
6 May 2026

Thank you for getting back to me.


I discussed the matter with an accountant, and his interpretation was that because the property was rented out before it first became a PPOR/main residence, the eligibility requirement is not fully satisfied. Based on this view, he believes that only the period during which the property was actually used as the owner’s PPOR would qualify for the exemption, and that the 6-year absence rule would not apply.


The accountant has suggested that the owner seek a Private Binding Ruling from the ATO for certainty.


Given the wording on the ATO website and your response, I just wanted to get your thoughts on whether you believe a Private Ruling is necessary in this situation, or whether it may simply be a matter of differing interpretations (i.e. find another accountant).


Thanks you

Loading
6 years rules on rental before becoming PPOR | ATO Community