Hi!
I'm hoping the ATO community can provide clarity on a scenario.
It's regarding the use of Section 118-192 of the ITAA 1997 and using the 6-year rule (118-145) in parallel. Specifically, can these two provisions operate together in the following scenario?
Scenario (dates and amounts are made up):
- Home was purchased in Jan 2013. Purchase Price = 200k (excluding stamp duty).
- This home was the Principal Place of Residence (PPOR).
- Owner lived in the first home for the first year (Jan 2013 - Jan 2014) as their PPOR. Improvements were made (during that time), and the home was revalued by a Certified Practising Valuer (API-accredited) at 300k as at Jan 2014.
- During Jan 2014-Jan 2017, the owner was renting (due to work relocation) and had no other PPOR during this period.
- The owner then purchased a second property and treated that property as their new PPOR in Jan 2017.
- The first home was then sold in Jan 2026 (for 500k).
My understanding is:
- We can use Section 118-192 of the ITAA 1997 to re-set cost base (as it was originally their main residence and was later used to produce income).
- Cost base re-sets to 300k
- CGT = 200k
- Using the 6-year (118-145) rule:
- Tax-exempt period = Jan 2014 - Jan 2017 (3 years)
- Taxable period = Jan 2017 - Jan 2026 (9 years)
- 9 out of 12 years = 75%
- CGT = 75% x 200k = 150k
- Apply 50% CGT discount:
- GCT = 50% x 150k = 75k
Net capital gain = 75k
Could someone please confirm whether this interpretation/calculation is correct, particularly:
- Whether s118-192 and s118-145 can be applied together in this way?
Thank you in advance!