Loading
Thunaxe(Newbie)Newbie
11 Oct 2023

Hi there,


We bought a property in February 2020 which unfortunately had tenants with 3 months left on their rental contract, so we were legally not allowed to kick them out right away. After they finally moved out, we moved in right away as it was always supposed to be owner-occupied. We now lived there for over 3 years and are considering to sell the property as it has gone up in value a fair bit.


I understand that the 6-year rule would allow us to rent it out before selling it and still avoid CGT as long as we treat it as our PPOR. However, this raises a few questions:


1.

The rule states that a property cannot be used to generate income before you live there and that it does not become your main residence until you move in (although we did not have any other properties to declare as PPOR). Does that mean we have to pay CGT even though it was simply not possible to move in immediately and we had no choice but to keep renting it out for a few months? Or would that still fall under "as soon as practicable"?


2.

If the 6-year rule does not apply to us because of the tenants we "inherited", we might decide to sell directly without renting it out first. In that case, would we at least be eligible for partial CGT exemption and only pay CGT for the period when it was generating income (i.e. 3 months in 2020)? If so, how would the change in value over that period be determined if we did not get a new valuation after the tenants moved out (since it's only been 3 months and the value would have been pretty much the same)?


Thanks in advance!

6,524 views
5 replies
6,524 views
5 replies

Most helpful response

Most helpful reply

Bruce4Tax(Taxicorn)Taxicorn
12 Oct 2023

  1. 6 year rule cannot apply because it has been rented before becoming MR
  2. You need to work out the capital gain as if it was fully taxable, then reduce that gain by the number of main residence days.

Holding costs during the MR period can reduce the capital gain e.g. interest, insurance, rates. Also improvements.


All replies

Most helpful reply

Bruce4Tax(Taxicorn)Taxicorn
12 Oct 2023

  1. 6 year rule cannot apply because it has been rented before becoming MR
  2. You need to work out the capital gain as if it was fully taxable, then reduce that gain by the number of main residence days.

Holding costs during the MR period can reduce the capital gain e.g. interest, insurance, rates. Also improvements.


Thunaxe(Newbie)Newbie
12 Oct 2023

Thanks Bruce4Tax,


Just to make sure I understand your 2nd point correctly, the assumption for CGT here is that the value appreciation is linear, and the total value appreciation (after considering costs of improvement, etc.) is applied pro-rata for the time that the property generated income?


Extremely simplified example:

The property is sold 5 years after purchase with a profit of 200,000 AUD.

It was rented out for the first 6 months of this period and MR afterwards.

Given the linear appreciation assumption the taxable part of the capital gain is 10% (6 out of 60 months), or 20,000 AUD.

With a marginal tax rate of 45% the CGT amount would be 9,000 AUD.


Correct?

Loading
Property bought with tenants, then moved in, still pay CGT? | ATO Community