Loading
This thread is archived and the information may not be up-to-date. You can't reply to this thread.
Seeker1(Initiate)Initiate
4 July 2024

Hi, We are an FBT-exempt not-for-profit organisation, allowing our staff to salary package up to $15,900. We have an employee who will be terminated due to redundancy and has unused long service leave and annual leave. We have a signed salary packaging agreement which states that they can sacrifice unused leave accrued after the agreement date. When we calculating her redundancy, her unused leave will be paid out as Lump Sum A with 32% tax.

As redundancy payments are considered separate from regular income and are treated and reported differently for tax purposes, we would like to hear from the ATO perspective whether this employee can salary sacrifice her unused leave (accrued after the effective SSA). If so, there will be a discrepancy between the Lump Sum A amount and the tax as she will have some tax savings. Is this acceptable for her tax return?


Thank you

900 views
3 replies
900 views
3 replies

Most helpful response

Most helpful reply

Deb_ATO(Community Support)Community Support
29 July 2024

Hi @Seeker1


You're on the right track. Redundancy payments can't be sacrificed.

Check out a similar post with some very helpful info.

All replies

SandraATO(Community Support)Community Support
8 July 2024

Hi @Seeker1


The short answer is that it'll depend on when the Salary Sacrifice Arrangement (SSA) was agreed to.

Future leave is able to be salary sacrificed but not leave that accrued before the SSA

See Taxation ruling: TR 2001/10. Paragraph 27 about entitlement.


Seeker1(Initiate)Initiate
25 July 2024

Thank you. The leave was accrued after the SSA. If it was a normal termination, we would be able to salary sacrifice the accrued leave as it was accrued after the SSA. However, in this case, it is a redundancy payout, so the leave will be calculated as Lump sum A with 32% tax. For example, this employee's Lump sum A amount is $15,000 and will be taxed $4,800. But if she can salary sacrifice $5,000, the tax will be $3,200 based on the reduced lump sum amount of $10,000.

My concern is that as the STP will report Lump Sum A as $15,000 and we are withholding only $3,200 of tax, how will the ATO view this when processing the employee's tax return? I worry that the ATO might think that we withheld less tax, resulting in a tax-debt for this employee of $1,600 (based on the tax difference of $4,800-$3,200 =$1,600 and not considering other factors).


Loading
Salary Packaging (not for profit) - Redundancy leave pay out | ATO Community