Loading
This thread is archived and the information may not be up-to-date. You can't reply to this thread.
Dan888(Enthusiast)Enthusiast
11 Nov 2024

I understand using the Low Value Pool (LV) is not compulsory. Is there any reason or advantage for using a LVP in favour of depreciating assets over their useful life - both for work related depreciating assets and depreciating assets related to my rental property?

348 views
1 replies
348 views
1 replies

Most helpful response

Most helpful reply

Taxduck(Taxicorn)Taxicorn
11 Nov 2024

At 15% in the first year and 30% every year after, this will give you a better depreciation rate than an item with an effective life of 8 years or more.

An item purchased on June 30, for example, 15% of its cost can be claimed.

Disadvantage of low value pools, once you have established one, every asset you buy between $301 and $999 must be added to the pool.

Whether one is established should be determined by what type of depreciating assets you are likely to purchase with regard to their effective lives.

All replies

Most helpful reply

Taxduck(Taxicorn)Taxicorn
11 Nov 2024

At 15% in the first year and 30% every year after, this will give you a better depreciation rate than an item with an effective life of 8 years or more.

An item purchased on June 30, for example, 15% of its cost can be claimed.

Disadvantage of low value pools, once you have established one, every asset you buy between $301 and $999 must be added to the pool.

Whether one is established should be determined by what type of depreciating assets you are likely to purchase with regard to their effective lives.

Loading
Why would one use a low value pool instead of depreciating assets over their useful life? | ATO Community