Loading
This thread is archived and the information may not be up-to-date. You can't reply to this thread.
25 Feb 2025

I receive a regular annual bonus from my employer, I am aware that this is classified as OTE. I am seeking to verify whether it is legitimate for the employer to be deducting and paying superannuation from the bonus? I believe it should be paid in addition to the bonus payment, in the same manner as my base salary?

Can someone verify the rules around this.

804 views
1 replies
804 views
1 replies

Most helpful response

Most helpful reply

PayrollDeanne(Taxicorn)Taxicorn
25 Feb 2025

Hiya @tax_professor 👋


There are legitimate circumstances where an employer may offer an employee a "Total Cost of Employment" (TCE) package that INCLUDES the super guarantee contribution. They are the minority as they are complex (I dislike them intensely).


It would be stipulated in the employment contract and the bonus policy of the employer would specify the different contract arrangements for SG.


I have clients who do this (and get themselves into a pickle on occasion), where, for example, they offer:

  • Salary of $111,500 incl SG - and when the SG rate goes up, the salary decreases. Employers started doing this when the annual SG rate increases recommenced.
  • There would be a statement in the Bonus policy that stated the Bonus was subject to SG and, for those with TCE packages, the SG would be deducted from the bonus amount.
  • They exist. I don't like them. They are mean, in my opinion, complex (industrially) and reflect that someone was trying to "beat the system" by torturing their payroll staff!

Most employers offer salary packages that are exclusive of SG. This is the standard remuneration arrangement. Using the example above, the employer would offer:

  • Salary of $100,000 plus "make such superannuation contributions to a superannuation fund for the benefit of the employee as will avoid the employer being required to pay the superannuation guarantee charge under superannuation legislation". Rolls right off the tongue, right? That quoted sentence is straight out of a Modern Award, which is why many employers use it.
  • This increases the cost of employment as the SG rate increases. Just like when the state/territory payroll tax rates rise, or the workcover premiums rise etc.

If your contract or bonus policy doesn't state explicitly about your salary including SG, then the Fair Work Ombudsman has a very narrow approach to permissible deductions from an employees' pay.


Some employers deduct SG from commissions, even though commissions are OTE and the salary packages are exclusive of SG, because they are trying to contain costs - by contravening their legislative obligations. SG is not an area to play fast and loose with, given the penalties.


When you marry up the complex Fair Work requirements with the complex ATO requirements, things get tricky! 🫣


Deanne


All replies

Most helpful reply

PayrollDeanne(Taxicorn)Taxicorn
25 Feb 2025

Hiya @tax_professor 👋


There are legitimate circumstances where an employer may offer an employee a "Total Cost of Employment" (TCE) package that INCLUDES the super guarantee contribution. They are the minority as they are complex (I dislike them intensely).


It would be stipulated in the employment contract and the bonus policy of the employer would specify the different contract arrangements for SG.


I have clients who do this (and get themselves into a pickle on occasion), where, for example, they offer:

  • Salary of $111,500 incl SG - and when the SG rate goes up, the salary decreases. Employers started doing this when the annual SG rate increases recommenced.
  • There would be a statement in the Bonus policy that stated the Bonus was subject to SG and, for those with TCE packages, the SG would be deducted from the bonus amount.
  • They exist. I don't like them. They are mean, in my opinion, complex (industrially) and reflect that someone was trying to "beat the system" by torturing their payroll staff!

Most employers offer salary packages that are exclusive of SG. This is the standard remuneration arrangement. Using the example above, the employer would offer:

  • Salary of $100,000 plus "make such superannuation contributions to a superannuation fund for the benefit of the employee as will avoid the employer being required to pay the superannuation guarantee charge under superannuation legislation". Rolls right off the tongue, right? That quoted sentence is straight out of a Modern Award, which is why many employers use it.
  • This increases the cost of employment as the SG rate increases. Just like when the state/territory payroll tax rates rise, or the workcover premiums rise etc.

If your contract or bonus policy doesn't state explicitly about your salary including SG, then the Fair Work Ombudsman has a very narrow approach to permissible deductions from an employees' pay.


Some employers deduct SG from commissions, even though commissions are OTE and the salary packages are exclusive of SG, because they are trying to contain costs - by contravening their legislative obligations. SG is not an area to play fast and loose with, given the penalties.


When you marry up the complex Fair Work requirements with the complex ATO requirements, things get tricky! 🫣


Deanne


Loading
Super Guarantee on Bonus | ATO Community