Loading
ARHRadmin(I'm new)I'm new
21 Oct 2025

I am being made redundant by a large corporate after 14 years service. They have deemed it to be a genuine redundancy, and as such a significant component of my payment will be tax-free up to the relevant limit. My question is: are there any circumstances where the redundancy might be deemed non-genuine by the ATO, and if so, who would be liable for the payment of the tax associated with a non-genuine redundancy? They are including a component of a 'golden handshake' payment and as such, want me to sign a deed of release that I won't take legal action against them in the future. I'm trying to make sure I'm adequately protected before signing the deed of release in case I could potentially be liable for a large tax bill in the future. Many thanks

115 views
2 replies
115 views
2 replies

All replies

PayrollDeanne(Taxicorn)Taxicorn
21 Oct 2025

Hiya @ARHRadmin 👋


ATO guidance defines what a non-genuine redundancy is within the context of the Fair Work definition of a genuine redundancy. How the ATO may detect likely non-genuine redundancies from genuine redundancies reported by employers to the ATO is complex and part of ATO's compliance and assurance activities 😉


If there was a non-genuine redundancy confirmed, the tax would be payable by you. There are a number of other factors that may contribute to that 🤓


It is best that you engage an employment lawyer to assess your personal circumstances and those of a genuine redundancy before you sign a legal document that may limit or extend your liability. 🫣


Deanne

Loading
Are there circumstances where the ATO can deem a genuine redundancy to be non-genuine? | ATO Community