Tax Ruling TR2021/2 prescribes that one of the conditions for a car parking fringe benefit to arise is that the ‘lowest representative fee’ charged by any commercial parking station for all-day parking within a one kilometre radius of the work car park exceeds the car parking threshold18 (the ‘car parking threshold requirement’). This is the same wording used in section 39A of the FBTAA 1986. However, on the ATO website under the page dealing with car parking fringe benefits (Car parking and FBT | Australian Taxation Office (ato.gov.au)) says the following: there is a commercial parking station that charges a fee for all-day parking within one kilometre of the premises on which the car is parked and the commercial parking station fee for all-day parking is more than the car parking threshold. These two statements actually mean two different things in my view? I presume that the provision in the FBTAA 1986 (and the Tax Ruling) would prevail over the webpage?
All replies
Featured articles
6 Feb 2026 · 4 min read time
24 Aug 2025 · 3 min read time
15 Apr 2026 · 3 min read time