Loading
mirvine(I'm new)I'm new
8 Jan 2025

I have started working for a not-for-profit rebateable employer. I am earning ~$75,000 and am able to package $15,900 for my rent. However, based on some online calculators it seems it might actually be worse off for me to salary package and I don't understand how that is possible. It seems like it is something to do with fringe benefit tax but from my understanding FBT is paid by the employer so how would that negatively affect my pay. I thought that by salary packaging I would just be able to avoid paying tax on the $15,900.


I do have HECS debt atm, but it seems even without that it still makes me worse off.


Any help explaining how this works would be greatly appreciated!

3,174 views
10 replies
3,174 views
10 replies

Most helpful response

Most helpful reply

Glenn4802(Devotee)Devotee
8 Jan 2025

Using the numbers you have provided, salary sacrificing $15,900 of rent will reduce your taxable income from $75,000 to $59,100. This should reduce your tax payable by around $5,200.


The flipside is that you will have a reportable fringe benefits amount of $30,000 included on your payment summary. You don't pay income tax on this amount, but your income for some income tests (including HECS repayments) is considered to be $89,100 i.e. $59,100 plus $30,000.

All replies

Most helpful reply

Glenn4802(Devotee)Devotee
8 Jan 2025

Using the numbers you have provided, salary sacrificing $15,900 of rent will reduce your taxable income from $75,000 to $59,100. This should reduce your tax payable by around $5,200.


The flipside is that you will have a reportable fringe benefits amount of $30,000 included on your payment summary. You don't pay income tax on this amount, but your income for some income tests (including HECS repayments) is considered to be $89,100 i.e. $59,100 plus $30,000.

Loading
Salary packaging disadvantageous? | ATO Community